posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22795 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18289 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19101 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19407 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19101 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19947 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20151 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20036 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20372 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20360 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20440 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20926 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20773 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21183 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20852 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21107 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21127 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21121 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21017 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20745 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20901 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20827 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21017 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21121 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21127 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21107 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20852 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21183 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20773 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20926 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20440 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20360 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20372 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20751 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20218 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19557 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19140 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18537 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19140 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19557 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20218 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20036 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18289 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.