posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24697 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19865 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20666 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20974 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20666 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21485 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21702 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21585 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22124 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21874 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21985 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22702 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22297 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22931 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22367 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22893 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22631 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22879 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22535 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22287 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22691 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22361 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22535 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22879 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22631 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22893 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22367 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22931 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22297 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22702 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21985 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21874 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22124 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22528 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21768 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21335 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20707 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20321 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20707 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21335 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21768 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21585 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19865 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


