posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23896 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19269 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20095 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20385 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20095 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20913 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21144 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21010 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21406 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21310 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21403 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21987 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21726 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22237 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21811 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22184 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22076 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22159 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21974 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21709 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21965 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21801 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21974 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22159 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22076 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22184 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21811 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22237 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21726 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21987 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21403 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21310 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21406 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21803 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21217 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20625 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20131 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19589 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20131 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20625 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21217 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21010 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19269 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


