posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22943 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18416 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19220 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19545 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19220 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20099 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20297 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20167 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20517 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20491 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20569 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21078 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20901 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21333 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20994 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21279 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21265 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21269 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21144 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20890 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21071 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20981 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21144 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21269 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21265 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21279 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20994 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21333 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20901 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21078 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20569 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20491 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20517 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20905 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20365 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19715 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19285 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18687 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19285 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19715 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20365 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20167 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18416 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.