home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 173104

Messaging Enabled

Back to the board Previous Post Reply

posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae

(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)

- A Farewell to Kings -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21125 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17066 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17836 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18198 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18671 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18870 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18795 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19011 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19109 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19149 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19533 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19530 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19795 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19585 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19690 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19833 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19717 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19734 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19533 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19473 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19542 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19360 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18958 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18197 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17942 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17243 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.