posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 30027 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23875 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24796 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 25148 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24796 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25730 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25932 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25864 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26442 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26105 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26283 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27109 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26535 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27250 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26689 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27173 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27027 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27143 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26757 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26801 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26905 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26438 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26757 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27143 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27027 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27173 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26689 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27250 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26535 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27109 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26283 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26105 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26442 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26837 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25959 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25533 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24886 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24467 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24886 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25533 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25959 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25864 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23875 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


