posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27781 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22214 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23117 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23471 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23117 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24070 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24261 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24113 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24691 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24350 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24540 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25316 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24783 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25483 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24904 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25435 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25223 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25432 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25034 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24977 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25192 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24789 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25034 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25432 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25223 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25435 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24904 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25483 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24783 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25316 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24540 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24350 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24691 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25147 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24273 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23857 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23209 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22793 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23209 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23857 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24273 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24113 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22214 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


