posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 29576 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23471 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24387 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24736 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24387 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25329 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25539 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25444 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26046 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25689 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25861 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26695 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26115 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26815 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26267 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26760 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26608 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26741 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26346 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26386 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26492 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26044 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26346 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26741 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26608 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26760 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26267 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26815 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26115 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26695 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25861 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25689 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26046 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26442 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25573 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25160 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24521 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24083 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24521 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25160 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25573 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25444 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23471 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


