posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27378 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21871 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22754 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23090 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22754 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23688 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23875 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23724 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24303 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23973 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24149 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24887 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24379 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25065 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24506 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25016 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24824 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25028 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24650 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24558 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24804 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24416 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24650 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25028 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24824 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25016 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24506 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25065 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24379 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24887 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24149 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23973 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24303 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24749 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23903 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23480 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22845 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22435 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22845 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23480 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23903 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23724 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21871 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


