posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26347 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21048 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21907 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22226 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21907 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22785 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23013 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22841 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23444 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23101 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23262 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24012 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23521 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24192 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23632 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24171 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23915 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24144 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23772 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23636 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23947 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23584 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23772 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24144 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23915 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24171 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23632 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24192 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23521 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24012 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23262 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23101 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23444 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23875 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23035 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22639 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21984 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21617 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21984 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22639 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23035 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22841 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21048 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


