posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23090 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18539 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19343 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19670 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19343 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20215 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20409 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20294 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20672 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20638 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20715 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21251 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21046 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21501 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21144 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21452 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21401 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21440 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21280 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21019 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21223 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21104 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21280 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21440 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21401 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21452 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21144 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21501 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21046 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21251 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20715 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20638 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20672 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21066 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20483 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19870 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19410 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18852 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19410 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19870 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20483 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20294 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18539 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.