posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25865 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20617 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21476 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21771 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21476 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22275 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22505 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22398 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22972 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22672 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22831 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23559 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23087 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23754 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23194 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23740 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23466 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23698 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23319 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23136 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23491 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23133 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23319 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23698 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23466 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23740 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23194 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23754 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23087 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23559 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22831 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22672 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22972 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23391 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22595 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22186 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21519 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21142 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21519 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22186 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22595 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22398 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20617 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


