posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 29823 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23705 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24627 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24989 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24627 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25582 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25792 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25708 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26293 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25945 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26114 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26943 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26379 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27073 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26513 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27009 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26863 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26994 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26597 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26659 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26746 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26288 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26597 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26994 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26863 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27009 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26513 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27073 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26379 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26943 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26114 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25945 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26293 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26679 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25808 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25384 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24736 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24301 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24736 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25384 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25808 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25708 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23705 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


