posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20590 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16518 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17327 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17672 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17327 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18141 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18318 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18213 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18426 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18510 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18524 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18920 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18897 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19136 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18934 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19050 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19198 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19068 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19105 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 18920 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 18835 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 18935 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19105 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19068 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19198 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19050 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18934 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19136 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18897 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18920 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18524 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18510 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18426 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18784 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18418 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17654 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17416 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16740 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17416 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17654 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18418 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18213 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16518 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.