posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27241 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21745 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22631 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22942 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22631 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23546 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23760 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23595 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24191 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23857 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24044 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24803 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24266 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24973 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24400 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24925 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24710 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24941 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24530 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24414 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24693 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24293 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24530 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24941 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24710 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24925 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24400 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24973 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24266 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24803 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24044 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23857 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24191 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24641 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23787 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23383 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22732 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22320 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22732 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23383 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23787 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23595 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21745 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


