posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 29572 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23462 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24380 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24723 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24380 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25320 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25529 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25433 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26036 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25683 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25855 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26687 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26108 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26807 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26259 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26755 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26603 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26735 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26343 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26377 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26485 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26038 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26343 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26735 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26603 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26755 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26259 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26807 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26108 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26687 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25855 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25683 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26036 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26434 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25563 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25152 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24509 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24073 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24509 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25152 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25563 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25433 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23462 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


