posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25117 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20139 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20958 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21269 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20958 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21784 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22007 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21876 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22441 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22161 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22290 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23021 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22577 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23246 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22657 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23208 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22933 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23191 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22834 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22618 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23023 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22677 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22834 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23191 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22933 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23208 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22657 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23246 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22577 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23021 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22290 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22161 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22441 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22859 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22088 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21658 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21005 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20626 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21005 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21658 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22088 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21876 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20139 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


