posted on 19/11/2020 08:20Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae
which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23577 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18991 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19826 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20124 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19826 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20689 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20904 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20772 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21181 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21098 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21196 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21757 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21512 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22002 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21599 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21961 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21869 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21941 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21744 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21476 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21733 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21574 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21744 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21941 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21869 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21961 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21599 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22002 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21512 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21757 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21196 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21098 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21181 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21554 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20972 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20381 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19891 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19324 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19891 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20381 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20972 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20772 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18991 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.