Posts: 172894
posted on 19/11/2020 08:20Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae
which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20590 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16517 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17326 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17672 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17326 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18141 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18317 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18210 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18425 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18510 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18523 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18920 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18897 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19135 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18933 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19050 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19198 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19067 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19105 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 18920 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 18835 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 18933 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19105 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19067 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19198 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19050 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18933 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19135 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18897 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18920 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18523 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18510 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18425 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18784 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18418 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17653 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17414 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16739 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17414 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17653 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18418 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18210 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16517 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.