Posts: 173156
posted on 19/11/2020 08:20Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae
which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21215 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17126 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17897 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18265 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17897 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18738 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18922 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18842 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19058 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19163 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19194 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19593 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19582 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19835 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19625 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19734 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19886 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19774 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19780 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19579 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19516 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19597 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19780 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19774 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19886 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19734 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19625 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19835 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19582 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19593 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19194 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19163 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19058 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19427 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19009 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18231 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17972 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17283 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17972 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18231 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19009 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18842 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17126 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.