posted on 19/11/2020 08:20Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae
which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23045 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18492 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19298 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19628 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19298 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20172 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20374 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20245 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20608 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20580 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20653 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21177 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20997 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21439 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21085 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21378 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21346 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21379 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21226 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20971 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21163 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21061 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21226 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21379 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21346 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21378 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21085 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21439 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20997 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21177 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20653 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20580 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20608 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21013 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20435 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19815 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19367 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18796 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19367 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19815 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20435 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20245 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18492 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.