posted on 19/11/2020 08:20Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae
which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22855 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18327 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19139 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19449 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19139 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20008 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20210 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20078 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20414 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20400 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20484 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20981 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20808 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21226 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20889 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21162 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21162 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21166 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21051 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20789 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20959 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20880 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21051 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21166 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21162 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21162 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20889 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21226 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20808 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20981 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20484 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20400 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20414 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20792 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20273 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19605 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19200 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18591 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19200 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19605 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20273 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20078 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18327 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.