Posts: 172778
posted on 19/11/2020 08:20Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae
which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20452 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16424 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17200 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17519 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17200 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 17997 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18162 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18105 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18302 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18386 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18408 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18808 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18784 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19019 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18823 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18940 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19080 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18954 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 18995 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 18803 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 18723 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 18794 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 18995 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18954 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19080 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18940 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18823 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19019 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18784 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18808 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18408 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18386 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18302 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18657 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18227 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17538 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17298 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16619 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17298 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17538 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18227 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18105 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16424 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.