Posts: 172789
posted on 19/11/2020 08:20Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae
which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20473 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16435 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17216 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17535 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17216 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18010 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18178 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18124 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18323 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18405 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18424 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18819 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18796 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19032 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18837 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18949 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19095 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18967 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19009 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 18814 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 18733 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 18806 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19009 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18967 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19095 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18949 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18837 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19032 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18796 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18819 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18424 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18405 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18323 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18669 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18239 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17551 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17306 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16630 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17306 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17551 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18239 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18124 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16435 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.