Posts: 175868
posted on 19/11/2020 08:20Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae
which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26138 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20817 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21668 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21978 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21668 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22548 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22779 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22594 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23193 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22863 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23019 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23764 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23283 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23947 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23376 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23930 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23669 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23893 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23524 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23372 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23703 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23338 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23524 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23893 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23669 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23930 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23376 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23947 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23283 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23764 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23019 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22863 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23193 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23628 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22801 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22397 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21749 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21377 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21749 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22397 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22801 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22594 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20817 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.