Posts: 173010
posted on 19/11/2020 08:20Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae
which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20984 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16919 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17693 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18033 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17693 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18512 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18703 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18620 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18851 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18931 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18972 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19365 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19343 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19602 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19395 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19520 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19681 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19535 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19562 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19349 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19298 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19353 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19562 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19535 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19681 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19520 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19395 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19602 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19343 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19365 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18972 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18931 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18851 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19194 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18814 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18049 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17785 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17092 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17785 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18049 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18814 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18620 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16919 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.