Posts: 175860
posted on 19/11/2020 08:20Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae
which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26123 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20810 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21662 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21964 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21662 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22529 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22763 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22582 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23177 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22848 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23007 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23751 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23268 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23938 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23364 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23921 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23655 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23884 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23509 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23351 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23686 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23319 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23509 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23884 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23655 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23921 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23364 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23938 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23268 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23751 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23007 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22848 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23177 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23616 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22786 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22379 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21730 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21365 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21730 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22379 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22786 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22582 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20810 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.