posted on 19/11/2020 08:20Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae
which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23063 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18516 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19324 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19648 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19324 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20194 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20390 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20265 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20638 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20605 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20683 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21214 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21019 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21465 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21107 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21405 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21374 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21406 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21256 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20995 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21190 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21083 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21256 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21406 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21374 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21405 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21107 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21465 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21019 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21214 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20683 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20605 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20638 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21033 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20454 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19838 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19388 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18816 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19388 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19838 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20454 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20265 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18516 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.