posted on 19/11/2020 08:20Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae
which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26048 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20767 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21623 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21929 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21623 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22474 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22703 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22546 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23116 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22804 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22957 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23676 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23211 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23879 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23314 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23849 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23593 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23829 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23462 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23296 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23624 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23262 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23462 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23829 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23593 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23849 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23314 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23879 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23211 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23676 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22957 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22804 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23116 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23556 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22723 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22313 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21664 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21294 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21664 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22313 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22723 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22546 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20767 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


