Posts: 172963
posted on 19/11/2020 08:20Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae
which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20815 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16791 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17555 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17909 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17555 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18379 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18558 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18470 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18701 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18782 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18810 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19223 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19191 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19437 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19240 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19355 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19499 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19369 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19394 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19209 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19146 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19196 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19394 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19369 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19499 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19355 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19240 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19437 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19191 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19223 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18810 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18782 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18701 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19035 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18658 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17887 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17637 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16954 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17637 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17887 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18658 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18470 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16791 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.