Posts: 8797
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21592 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17363 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18238 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18543 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18238 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19046 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19265 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19138 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19340 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19454 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19496 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19871 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19846 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20110 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19901 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20028 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20170 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20064 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20064 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19861 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19759 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19919 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20064 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20064 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20170 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20028 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19901 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20110 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19846 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19871 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19496 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19454 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19340 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19706 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19247 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18539 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18279 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17579 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18279 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18539 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19247 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19138 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17363 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.