Posts: 8865
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26133 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20813 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21665 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21972 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21665 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22541 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22773 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22585 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23186 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22853 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23008 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23757 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23275 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23943 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23373 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23927 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23666 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23890 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23520 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23366 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23698 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23329 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23520 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23890 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23666 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23927 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23373 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23943 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23275 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23757 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23008 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22853 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23186 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23621 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22795 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22388 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21737 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21372 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21737 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22388 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22795 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22585 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20813 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.