Posts: 8809
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23081 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18532 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19339 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19667 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19339 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20211 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20404 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20287 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20662 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20625 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20709 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21241 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21034 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21488 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21134 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21438 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21394 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21432 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21275 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21015 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21213 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21099 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21275 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21432 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21394 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21438 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21134 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21488 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21034 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21241 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20709 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20625 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20662 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21055 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20475 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19858 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19404 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18847 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19404 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19858 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20475 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20287 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18532 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.