Posts: 8852
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26044 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20753 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21611 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21922 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21611 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22466 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22695 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22533 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23103 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22795 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22946 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23665 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23205 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23870 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23313 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23840 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23588 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23815 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23449 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23287 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23613 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23256 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23449 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23815 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23588 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23840 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23313 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23870 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23205 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23665 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22946 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22795 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23103 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23540 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22717 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22306 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21653 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21283 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21653 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22306 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22717 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22533 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20753 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.