Posts: 8894
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27772 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22207 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23115 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23465 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23115 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24065 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24249 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24108 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24675 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24344 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24537 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25307 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24776 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25465 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24893 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25418 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25213 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25413 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25028 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24966 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25183 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24784 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25028 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25413 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25213 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25418 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24893 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25465 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24776 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25307 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24537 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24344 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24675 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25129 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24264 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23848 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23205 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22786 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23205 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23848 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24264 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24108 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22207 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.