posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 29818 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23696 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24620 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24982 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24620 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25576 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25786 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25701 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26286 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25941 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26106 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26933 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26376 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27060 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26505 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26996 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26858 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26982 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26587 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26651 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26729 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26280 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26587 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26982 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26858 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26996 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26505 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27060 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26376 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26933 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26106 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25941 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26286 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26671 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25797 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25375 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24725 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24295 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24725 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25375 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25797 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25701 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23696 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

