Posts: 8866
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26180 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20875 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21718 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22036 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21718 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22594 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22822 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22653 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23242 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22911 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23067 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23803 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23340 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23991 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23438 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23974 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23713 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23943 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23575 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23443 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23748 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23394 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23575 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23943 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23713 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23974 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23438 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23991 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23340 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23803 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23067 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22911 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23242 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23681 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22840 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22443 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21798 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21429 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21798 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22443 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22840 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22653 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20875 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.