Posts: 8800
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22808 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18301 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19112 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19415 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19112 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19960 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20167 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20046 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20380 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20373 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20455 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20944 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20784 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21196 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20868 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21131 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21138 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21133 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21029 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20762 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20914 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20842 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21029 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21133 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21138 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21131 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20868 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21196 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20784 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20944 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20455 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20373 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20380 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20762 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20234 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19570 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19155 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18555 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19155 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19570 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20234 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20046 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18301 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.