Posts: 8961
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 31452 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25165 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26083 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 26508 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26083 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 27058 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 27317 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27253 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27909 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27557 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 27732 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28579 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27898 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28628 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28089 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28579 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28474 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28579 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28160 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 28288 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 28313 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 27799 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28160 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28579 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28474 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28579 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28089 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28628 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27898 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28579 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 27732 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27557 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27909 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 28269 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27377 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26918 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26221 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 25797 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26221 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26918 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27377 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27253 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25165 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.