Posts: 8797
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20682 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16668 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17432 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17793 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17432 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18265 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18450 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18354 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18576 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18664 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18686 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19086 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19072 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19315 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19114 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19225 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19380 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19241 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19273 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19080 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19038 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19088 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19273 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19241 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19380 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19225 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19114 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19315 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19072 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19086 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18686 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18664 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18576 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18926 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18560 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17784 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17535 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16852 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17535 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17784 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18560 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18354 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16668 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.