Posts: 8852
posted on 19/11/2020 10:37I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci.
Guess you don't agree with it. Which I find surprising from someone who in the past has claimed to be a libertarian.
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
I think it was The Canary, I may be wrong. Probably am.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26050 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20768 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21624 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21930 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21624 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22475 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22703 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22548 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23116 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22806 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22959 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23679 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23215 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23880 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23314 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23851 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23595 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23829 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23462 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23298 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23625 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23263 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23462 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23829 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23595 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23851 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23314 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23880 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23215 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23679 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22959 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22806 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23116 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23557 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22723 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22316 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21668 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21295 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21668 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22316 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22723 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22548 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20768 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.