home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 8809

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 19/11/2020 12:00So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci.

i.e. "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23049 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18497 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19304 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19632 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20173 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20375 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20247 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20610 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20586 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20660 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21186 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21003 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21447 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21092 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21384 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21353 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21383 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21229 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20975 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21167 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21066 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21017 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20436 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19817 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19367 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18799 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.