posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23645 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19073 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19896 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20207 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19896 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20751 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20962 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20831 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21236 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21154 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21243 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21792 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21568 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22039 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21655 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21994 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21920 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21981 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21792 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21538 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21787 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21632 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21792 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21981 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21920 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21994 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21655 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22039 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21568 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21792 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21243 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21154 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21236 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21605 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21033 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20434 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19948 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19378 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19948 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20434 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21033 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20831 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19073 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.