posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 29568 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23450 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24370 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24714 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24370 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25307 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25515 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25418 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26025 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25674 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25843 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26679 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26093 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26794 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26248 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26744 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26590 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26721 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26325 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26364 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26475 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26025 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26325 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26721 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26590 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26744 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26248 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26794 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26093 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26679 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25843 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25674 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26025 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26424 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25549 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25138 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24492 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24056 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24492 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25138 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25549 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25418 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23450 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


