posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20452 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16420 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17198 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17516 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17198 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 17990 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18157 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18103 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18297 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18381 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18402 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18804 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18779 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19015 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18818 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18933 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19078 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18951 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 18990 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 18796 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 18716 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 18789 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 18990 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18951 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19078 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18933 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18818 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19015 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18779 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18804 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18402 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18381 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18297 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18652 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18221 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17534 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17293 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16613 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17293 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17534 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18221 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18103 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16420 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.