posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20481 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16444 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17228 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17550 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17228 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18024 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18191 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18130 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18337 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18417 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18434 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18834 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18809 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19044 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18848 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18960 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19105 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18978 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19020 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 18819 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 18741 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 18816 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19020 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18978 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19105 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18960 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18848 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19044 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18809 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18834 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18434 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18417 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18337 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18682 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18252 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17561 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17311 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16639 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17311 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17561 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18252 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18130 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16444 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.