posted on 19/11/2020 13:13any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman
Thought not, only outraged when it suits
- Tundumcaseum! -
- Tundumcaseum! -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24027 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19377 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20205 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20521 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20205 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21041 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21268 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21133 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21536 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21435 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21530 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22118 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21857 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22357 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21933 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22322 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22195 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22300 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22091 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21837 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22109 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21930 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22091 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22300 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22195 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22322 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21933 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22357 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21857 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22118 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21530 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21435 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21536 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21933 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21338 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20762 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20256 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19723 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20256 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20762 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21338 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21133 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19377 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


