Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22653 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18193 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18984 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19310 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18984 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19840 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20041 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19918 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20232 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20245 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20312 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20796 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20666 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21031 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20753 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20987 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21015 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20988 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20916 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20667 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20793 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20724 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20916 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20988 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21015 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20987 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20753 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21031 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20666 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20796 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20312 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20245 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20232 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20608 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20128 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19420 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19031 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18407 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19031 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19420 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20128 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19918 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18193 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.