Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20462 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16433 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17211 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17527 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17211 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18004 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18172 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18115 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18309 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18395 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18415 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18817 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18793 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19026 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18828 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18944 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19089 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18961 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19002 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 18807 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 18728 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 18801 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19002 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18961 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19089 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18944 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18828 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19026 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18793 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18817 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18415 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18395 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18309 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18666 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18233 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17547 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17303 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16626 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17303 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17547 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18233 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18115 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16433 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.