Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26046 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20753 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21612 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21922 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21612 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22468 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22696 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22534 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23104 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22795 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22948 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23666 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23207 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23871 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23313 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23841 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23589 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23819 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23454 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23291 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23617 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23257 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23454 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23819 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23589 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23841 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23313 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23871 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23207 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23666 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22948 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22795 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23104 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23542 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22720 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22306 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21656 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21284 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21656 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22306 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22720 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22534 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20753 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.