Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20957 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16903 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17678 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18020 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17678 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18497 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18687 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18605 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18834 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18912 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18945 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19343 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19318 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19577 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19374 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19504 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19662 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19520 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19552 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19336 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19286 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19326 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19552 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19520 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19662 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19504 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19374 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19577 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19318 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19343 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18945 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18912 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18834 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19174 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18794 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18029 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17760 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17075 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17760 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18029 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18794 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18605 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16903 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.