Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22838 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18312 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19128 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19430 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19128 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19982 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20190 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20062 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20395 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20387 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20468 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20963 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20793 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21210 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20879 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21145 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21149 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21149 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21036 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20774 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20939 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20856 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21036 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21149 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21149 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21145 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20879 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21210 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20793 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20963 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20468 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20387 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20395 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20776 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20250 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19590 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19180 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18568 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19180 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19590 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20250 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20062 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18312 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.