Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21197 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17114 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17884 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18256 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17884 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18719 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18906 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18833 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19048 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19153 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19188 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19586 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19576 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19829 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19618 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19724 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19879 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19769 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19774 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19567 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19507 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19590 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19774 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19769 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19879 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19724 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19618 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19829 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19576 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19586 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19188 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19153 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19048 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19413 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18998 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18224 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17969 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17278 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17969 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18224 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18998 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18833 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17114 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.