Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23057 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18510 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19316 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19638 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19316 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20187 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20386 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20259 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20628 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20596 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20670 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21204 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21013 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21459 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21103 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21400 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21365 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21398 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21246 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20987 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21178 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21076 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21246 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21398 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21365 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21400 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21103 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21459 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21013 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21204 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20670 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20596 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20628 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21027 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20448 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19831 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19381 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18808 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19381 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19831 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20448 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20259 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18510 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.