Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 29248 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23214 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24126 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24511 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24126 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25087 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25282 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25138 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25717 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25385 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25593 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26371 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25860 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26540 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25993 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26488 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26329 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26456 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26076 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26119 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26232 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25811 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26076 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26456 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26329 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26488 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25993 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26540 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25860 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26371 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25593 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25385 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25717 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26166 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25286 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24865 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24230 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23795 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24230 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24865 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25286 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25138 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23214 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.