Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22952 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18419 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19225 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19551 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19225 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20105 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20305 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20176 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20526 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20501 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20580 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21090 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20915 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21346 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21007 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21290 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21275 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21280 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21158 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20905 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21081 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20989 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21158 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21280 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21275 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21290 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21007 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21346 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20915 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21090 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20580 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20501 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20526 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20916 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20369 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19724 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19294 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18696 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19294 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19724 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20369 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20176 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18419 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.