Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 29597 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23488 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24403 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24754 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 24403 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 25357 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25561 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25462 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26058 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25707 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25877 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26710 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26128 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26828 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26283 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26773 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26625 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26752 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26356 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 26401 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26505 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26063 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 26356 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26752 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26625 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26773 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26283 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26828 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26128 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26710 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25877 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25707 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26058 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 26457 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25582 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25172 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24535 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24098 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24535 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25172 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25582 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 25462 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 23488 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.