Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20878 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16851 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17614 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17966 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17614 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18442 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18616 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18533 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18763 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18842 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18872 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19278 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19252 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19498 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19305 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19427 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19568 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19431 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19458 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19272 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19208 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19253 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19458 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19431 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19568 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19427 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19305 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19498 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19252 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19278 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18872 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18842 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18763 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19098 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18717 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17951 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17698 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17020 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17698 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17951 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18717 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18533 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16851 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.