Posts: 20126
posted on 19/11/2020 13:31Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho
Pore ROR
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- “We see things they’ll never see” -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20502 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16450 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17240 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17568 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17240 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18040 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18212 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18136 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18348 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18425 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18449 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18843 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18825 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19057 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18861 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18972 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19116 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18990 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19036 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 18833 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 18748 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 18837 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19036 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18990 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19116 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18972 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18861 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19057 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18825 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18843 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18449 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18425 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18348 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18694 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18271 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17572 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17327 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16652 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17327 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17572 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18271 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18136 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16450 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.