Posts: 8800
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22684 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18212 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19005 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19329 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19005 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19867 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20059 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19945 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20269 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20270 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20343 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20819 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20692 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21066 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20782 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21016 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21041 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21018 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20939 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20694 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20816 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20744 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20939 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21018 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21041 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21016 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20782 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21066 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20692 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20819 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20343 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20270 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20269 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20638 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20143 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19444 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19056 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18427 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19056 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19444 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20143 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19945 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18212 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.