Posts: 8797
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20456 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16428 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17207 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17524 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17207 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18001 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18166 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18108 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18305 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18392 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18413 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18811 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18788 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19023 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18826 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18942 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19083 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18957 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19000 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 18804 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 18727 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 18799 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19000 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18957 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19083 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18942 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18826 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19023 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18788 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18811 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18413 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18392 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18305 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18663 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18230 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17544 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17302 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16622 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17302 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17544 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18230 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18108 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16428 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.