Posts: 8961
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 31517 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25229 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26151 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 26574 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 26151 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 27122 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 27384 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27320 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27976 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27614 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 27795 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28642 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27953 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28686 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28143 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28639 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28533 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28639 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28224 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 28353 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 28381 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 27859 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 28224 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 28639 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 28533 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 28639 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 28143 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 28686 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27953 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 28642 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 27795 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 27614 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27976 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 28332 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27443 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26987 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26292 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 25875 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 26292 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26987 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 27443 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 27320 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 25229 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.