Posts: 8838
posted on 19/11/2020 14:51which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci.
The Spectator.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25155 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20161 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20973 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21300 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20973 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21801 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22027 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21894 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22458 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22184 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22312 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23033 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22598 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23259 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22674 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23217 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22953 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23207 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22849 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22647 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23040 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22703 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22849 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23207 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22953 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23217 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22674 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23259 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22598 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23033 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22312 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22184 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22458 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22879 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22106 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21679 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21024 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20644 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21024 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21679 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22106 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21894 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20161 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.